youngsyp said:
I give up. It's completely pointless trying to communicate with you.
The section I printed was from a company you mentioned. As it looks like you're too ignorant to see why I did that, I'll spell it out for you... It was to show that you were again, talking rubbish and that they state you can mount the sensor anywhere in the exhaust run.
:frusty: NO YOU
CANT FOR ACCURATE READINGS :shock:
Maybe 2nd time you may have got it but 3rd time nope....
Lets try 1 last time its,
30-36" MAXIMUM distance from exhaust valve (Turbo cars) 16" NA
Not in or after the CAT I say again not In or AFTER the cat
At angle to prevent water ingressing the outer sensor housing and the sensor element and also avoiding heat soak if vertical
;-)
youngsyp said:
I have no issue acknowledging the rest of the section as a recommendation from Dynojet but, nothing more than that. And you clearly missed (is there a pattern forming) that they state 10 degrees as a minimum. Mounting the sensor at anywhere between the 10 and 2 oclock position seems to be the norm, depending on space around the pipe.
And, again you seem not to have noticed but, the two companies I mentioned originally i.e. Innovate Motorsport and Zietronix both produce wideband controllers and have done for many years. They also have a very good reputation in the tuning world.
So, that's 3 expert companies that actually make the products that we're discussing, that say the same thing and all you can come up with is AEM and one of their retailers i.e. Alamo Autosports ????!!!!
You might want to look at Bosch's website, they actually make the sensors all these companies use. ;-)
Somehow I think I know that :roll:
youngsyp said:
There's no spam in my comments. It's all fact as anyone can see for themselves.
Ohh so its a good idea to mount the sensor on the tailpipe then at the wrong angle? Even Motec tell you not to place it close to the end of the exhaust due to erratic readings due to Oxygen re-entering the pipe.
youngsyp said:
To cap this post off, I don't care if anyone listens/reads and takes in what I put up. I do it to help them out, not myself. That's what this forum is for I thought ?!
The only thing I would say to do is do some reading yourselves. The answers are out there and very easy to find.
:lol: Classic you firstly tell people they dont know the difference between a RTD EGT and a Bosch Lsu4.2 (When they clearly do) then you tell people not to do as the company says and go and install your sensor in the tailpipe which will give you false readings but hey the club members love it when there money and time is waisted :shock:
youngsyp said:
Oh, and I'll remind people again that JPWard was the one who was adamant that cutting holes in structural parts of the car was a good idea
You should try reading the post i never EVER said it was a good idea but I have seen it done on cars! But you will be the "Caveman" and still be mentioning it in 20 years as you somehow think its something worth mentioning for whatever reason??
:doh:
But yes your right as you say so right zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz oops fell asleep there Maybe we need to spell it out for you Paul,
T h i s i s a t h r e a d a b o u t y o u p r o c l a i m i n g y o u k n o w b e s t b e t t e r t h a n t h e t o p s u p p l i e r s ( Motec,AEM & Dynojet) a n d A l a m o M o t o r s p o r t w h o a r e p r o b a b l y t h e m o s t e x p e r i e n c e d U S b e s p o k e t u r b o k i t f a b r i c a t o r s & t u n e r s . . . . . .
:der: