INteresting idea but lets look at it another way ;-)pulsarboby said:im surprised that having a large rear track and narrower front will make it understeer more though, would have thought it would have been the other way round! as on hard turn in the back would try to kick out due to the narrower turning angle on the front.
ie imagine say a trike lol, it would be impossible to make it understeer because the rear is much wider, but i could well be wrong?
Put a 5kg weight on a 1m pole attached and centred to a 2m base so the pole and base makes an upside down T shape on the floor. If you push the weight it'll probably be stable but if you half the base width to 1m, it'll probably be unstable. If you changed the weight to 10kg and pushed it might be unstable again. Change the base to 4m and its stable. Change the pole to 4m and its not again..... blah blah
What does all that mean.... If the car is unstable you need to lower the centre of gravity or broaden the track. To simplify, the end that is unstable will generally lose traction first and over/under steer.
This is why a rear engineed car has a wider track at the back and front engined cars have a broader track at the front. The heavier bit needs more track to give front and rear the same stability. The other option of lowering the ride height at one end is impractical on most cars.
2 howevers...
1. Changing your front track will change your ackermann angle which can mess up the way the car steers and cause torque steer
2. Life is not simple and with low grip conditions you want extra weight transfer so a smaller track can help. Think of it like digging in with one foot in a tug of war. This is why a slightly higher ride height helps when its raining...... see previous post about ride heights ;-)