GTi-R23 said:
The extra zinc treatment is to prevent the disk going rusty where the pads don't touch it (I think) EBC do the a similar thing iirc, although i don't think it works all that well.
That's the theory. But, as you say, it doesn't work.
Galvanising (the non dumbed down term for zinc coating) is a waste of money on brake disks as the go through too many variables. They get heat cycled, covered in brake dust and road grime etc...
Galvanising doesn't even work on steel fences and they only go through weather variables !
GTi-R23 said:
I still hold the opinion that the rear brakes are not nearly as important as the fronts, so I'd say as long as you have good std disks and pads at the rear it should suffice. How would you know if you were glazing the rears if the fronts are working spot on?
I agree that the rear brakes don't add much to the overall braking effort but, they are very important for braking stability.
If you go for large, multi piston front brakes and leave the rears as stock, the car will dive and 'squirm' more than it would with an equivalent uprating of the rear brakes.
To kind of reinforce that theory, after yesterdays track action, my rear disks still had the pad marks on them from having the handbrake applied all week.
So, the pads are either very glazed (possible as I had issues with the handbrake sticking on in the past) or, the pressure applied by the rear calipers is quite low ?! The pads are definitely wearing at the rear though !
Paul