here goes,
u probably know that i study motorsport engineering at herts uni (then again probably not!)
basically we have motorsport lectures, and one of the lecturers is Jeff Peters (dont know if uv heard of him) but he works for some touring car company and he is a very clever bloke. basically he is one of their engineers and does alot of shit to their cars - i know he maps cars (need to give him mine when its sorted)
in one of the lectures we were discussing steering and suspension, this will really drag on so il cut it short. onto roll bars - he said they dont do shit, if anything they worsen ur steering.
when u steer into a corner, ur opposite wheel lifts and the purpose of the roll bar is to keep everything stiff and keep the wheels on the ground but it has a sort of fooked effect, as one wheel lifts, cos of the roll bar it lifts the other one - basically doing the exact opposite of its purpose.
il leave it at that for now and i will try to argue my case as i know EVERYONE will object to what i said, but let me tell u that this geezer fought this case well and proved his point and it all made sense in the way he explained it.
ok, throw ur abuse at me, im ready i think :twisted:
saj
ps, he also was really against strut braces, thats y i aint got none