Well sad to say this but as much as it comes to innovative ideas but the main pitfall with British cars is it's so unreliable. Pardon me but that's the whole truth. Dont get me wrong here but i feel i'm in a better position to make this claim is that living in this part of the world where reliability is the key word to success and getting u out alive which is why the Japanese succeed and the British cars falters.
Take for example, we have 2 Rangies, the classic and the 4.6HSE.
They are excellent cars in terms of prestige, ride, torque, and excellent suspension articulation. But sad to say they are just way to sensitive and the 2nd gen rangie has x4.6 HIGHLY SENSITIVE ELECTRONICS. That thing has failed us once too many a times. Imgaine having to hire a flatbed to tow the thing hundreds of km fron the city all coz the stupid airsuspension decides to go haywire.
Which is why most people would stick to going into the woods and offroading in their LandCruisers and Hilux. I'm sure a few of u have seen Jeremy Clarkson shagging the daylights and chucking the thing into the sea in Top Gear and it still move.
:roll: :lol:
If only British manufacturers could just sort out your electrics and reliabilty issues i'm sure it would win praises with it's old world charm and well i dunno how to describe it, the "Britishness" quirks and idiosyncrasies that just attracts us.
Probably the other reason why Lotus would go with Toyota engines for its relibilty, meeting emission regs and spare parts. Well oddly i find that Elise with the B18C Type R engines seems much nicer compaired to the VHPD190 that seems to be wheezing abit. Only downside i notice from friend's feedback it's kinda vicious to handle around Sepang initially. Must be a heavy lump.
Oh well enough ramblings.