A
Andyt
Guest
Please help!
:roll:
I have wanted a Pulsar GTi-R for a number of years, and currently have the opportunity to import a very low mileage example from Japan. However I thought it may be a good idea to take a test drive in one before I took the leap and ordered it.
:?
I noticed a local garage had a “standard” 1994 example on the forecourt, the car had done 100,000km (65ish miles) and no modifications ie exhaust, filter, boost controller etc. The car wasn’t the RB(?) lighter version and was still on standard rims/tyres.
I took the car for a 20min test drive over various conditions (long straights, standing starts and some twisty stuff) ….. HOWEVER it wasn’t’ as I’d expected! Even after warming up the car was very sluggish and when the boost did eventually arrive it really wasn’t the “light speed” launch I was expecting. The gears were very imprecise to say the least – yet all seemed well from the dials in the cabin.
:shock:
I currently drive a MR2 Turbo (to be kept for track use) and I would have thought the performance should be at least comparable to this – with the advantage of 4x4 traction. Honestly, it was more like 2.0 Vectra/Mondeo territory than a true “Hot Hatch”. I think my expectations were realistic (especially after seeing the cars in Feb J-Tuners thrash perform!), does the Pulsar require stage 1 modifications and above for the car to truly shine? It’s fine if it does but that wasn’t really how I’d imagined it to be.
Please can anyone in the know shed any light on this? Was the example I tried a shed? Tired? It has really put me off the idea of Pulsar ownership (to the extent of looking at an S14a Sylvia) which is a shame as I was looking forward to some trips to the pod again this year with a new weapon of mass destruction! :twisted:
Regards
:roll:
I have wanted a Pulsar GTi-R for a number of years, and currently have the opportunity to import a very low mileage example from Japan. However I thought it may be a good idea to take a test drive in one before I took the leap and ordered it.
:?
I noticed a local garage had a “standard” 1994 example on the forecourt, the car had done 100,000km (65ish miles) and no modifications ie exhaust, filter, boost controller etc. The car wasn’t the RB(?) lighter version and was still on standard rims/tyres.
I took the car for a 20min test drive over various conditions (long straights, standing starts and some twisty stuff) ….. HOWEVER it wasn’t’ as I’d expected! Even after warming up the car was very sluggish and when the boost did eventually arrive it really wasn’t the “light speed” launch I was expecting. The gears were very imprecise to say the least – yet all seemed well from the dials in the cabin.
:shock:
I currently drive a MR2 Turbo (to be kept for track use) and I would have thought the performance should be at least comparable to this – with the advantage of 4x4 traction. Honestly, it was more like 2.0 Vectra/Mondeo territory than a true “Hot Hatch”. I think my expectations were realistic (especially after seeing the cars in Feb J-Tuners thrash perform!), does the Pulsar require stage 1 modifications and above for the car to truly shine? It’s fine if it does but that wasn’t really how I’d imagined it to be.
Please can anyone in the know shed any light on this? Was the example I tried a shed? Tired? It has really put me off the idea of Pulsar ownership (to the extent of looking at an S14a Sylvia) which is a shame as I was looking forward to some trips to the pod again this year with a new weapon of mass destruction! :twisted:
Regards